© Harikrishna Katragadda/GreenpeaceStudents in the village of Tahipur in Bihar used kerosene lanterns for studying.
  
  Fixes looks at solutions to social problems and why they work.
    Tags:
 electricity, India, innovation, Poverty, power
When we hear the word innovation, we often think of new technologies  or silver bullet solutions — like hydrogen fuel cells or a cure for  cancer. To be sure, breakthroughs are vital: antibiotics and vaccines,  for example, transformed global health. But as we’ve argued in Fixes,  some of the greatest advances come from taking old ideas or technologies  and making them accessible to millions of people who are underserved.
        One area where this is desperately needed is access to electricity.  In the age of the iPad, it’s easy to forget that roughly a quarter of  the world’s population —  about a billion and a half people  (pdf) — still lack electricity. This isn’t just an inconvenience; it  takes a severe toll on economic life, education and health. It’s  estimated that two million people die prematurely each year as a result  of pulmonary diseases caused by the indoor burning of fuels for cooking  and light. Close to half are children who die of pneumonia.
In vast stretches of the developing world, after the sun sets,  everything goes dark. In sub-Saharan Africa, about 70 percent of the  population lack electricity. However, no country has more citizens  living without power than India, where more than 400 million people,  the vast majority of them villagers, have no electricity. The place  that remains most in darkness is Bihar, India’s poorest state, which has  more than 80 million people, 85 percent of whom live in households with  no grid connection. Because Bihar has nowhere near the capacity to meet  its current power demands, even those few with connections receive  electricity sporadically and often at odd hours, like between 3:00 a.m  and 6:00 a.m., when it is of little use.
 This is why I’m writing today about a small but fast-growing off-grid electricity company based in Bihar called Husk Power Systems.  It has created a system to turn rice husks into electricity that is  reliable, eco-friendly and affordable for families that can spend only  $2 a month for power. The company has 65 power units that serve a total  of 30,000 households and is currently installing new systems at the rate  of two to three per week.
 What’s most interesting about Husk Power is how it has combined many  incremental improvements that add up to something qualitatively new —  with the potential for dramatic scale. The company expects to have 200  systems by the end of 2011, each serving a village or a small village  cluster. Its plan is to ramp that up significantly, with the goal of  having 2,014 units serving millions of clients by the end of 2014
Husk Power was founded by four friends: Gyanesh Pandey, Manoj Sinha,  Ratnesh Yadav and Charles W. Ransler, who met attending different  schools in India and the United States. Pandey, the company’s chief  executive, grew up in a village in Bihar without electricity. “I felt  low because of that,” he told me when we met recently in New Delhi. He  decided to study electrical engineering. At college in India, he  experienced the Indian prejudice against Biharis — some students refused  to sit at the same table with him — which contributed to his desire to  emigrate to the U.S.. He found his way to the Rensselaer Polytechnic  Institute, in Troy, N.Y., where he completed a master’s degree before  landing a position with the semiconductor manufacturer International  Rectifier in Los Angeles. His job was to figure out how to get the best  performance from integrated circuits at the lowest possible cost. This  helped him develop a problem-solving aptitude that would prove useful  for Husk Power.
 He was soon earning a six-figure income. He bought his family a  diesel-powered electric generator. As a single man living in Los  Angeles, he enjoyed traveling, dining out and going to clubs. “I was  basically cruising through life,” he recalled. “But along with that  pleasure and smoothness was a dark zone in my head.” He began meditating  — and he realized that he felt compelled to return home and use his  knowledge to bring light to Bihar.
 Back in India, he and his friend Yadav, an entrepreneur, spent the  next few years experimenting. They explored the possibility of producing  organic solar cells. They tried growing a plant called jatropha, whose  seeds can be used for biodiesel. Both proved impractical as businesses.  They tested out solar lamps, but found their application limited. “In  the back of my mind, I always thought there would be some high tech  solution that would solve the problem,” said Pandey.
 One day he ran into a salesman who sold gasifiers — machines that  burn organic materials in an oxygen restricted environment to produce  biogas which can be used to power an engine. There was nothing new about  gasifiers; they had been around for decades. People sometimes burned  rice husks in them to supplement diesel fuel, which was expensive. “But  nobody had thought to use rice husks to run a whole power system,”  explained Pandey.
 In Bihar, poverty is extreme. Pretty much everything that can be used will  be used — recycled or burned or fed to animals. Rice husks are the big  exception. When rice is milled, the outside kernel, or husk, is  discarded. Because the husk contains a lot of silica, it doesn’t burn  well for cooking. A recent Greenpeace study  (pdf) reports that Bihar alone produces 1.8 billion kilograms of rice  husk per year. Most of it ends up rotting in landfills and emitting  methane, a greenhouse gas.
 Courtesy of Husk Power SystemsThe mini-power plant during the day.
 Pandey and Yadav began bringing pieces together for an electric  distribution system powered by the husks. They got a gasifier, a  generator set, filtering, cleaning and cooling systems, piping and  insulated wiring. They went through countless iterations to get the  system working: adjusting valves and pressures, the gas-to-air ratios,  the combustion temperature, the starting mechanism. In they end, they  came up with a system that could burn 50 kilograms of rice husk per hour  and produce 32 kilowatts of power, sufficient for about 500 village  households.
 They reached out to people in a village called Tamkuha, in Bihar,  offering them a deal: for 80 rupees a month — roughly $1.75 — a  household could get daily power for one 30-watt or two 15-watt compact  fluorescent  light (CFL) bulbs and unlimited cell phone charging between  5:00 p.m and 11:00 p.m. For many families, the price was less than half  their monthly kerosene costs, and the light would be much brighter. It  would also be less smoky, less of a fire hazard, and better for the  environment. Customers could pay for more power if they needed it — for  radios, TVs, ceiling fans or water pumps. But many had no appliances and  lived in huts so small, one bulb was enough. The system went live on  August 15, 2007, the anniversary of India’s independence.
 It worked. Back in the United States, their colleagues Sinha and  Ransler, who were pursuing M.B.A.s at the University of Virginia’s  Darden School of Business, put together a business plan and set out to  raise money. They came first in two student competitions,  garnering prizes of $10,000 and $50,000. The company received a grant  from the Shell Foundation and set up three more systems in 2008. It has  since raised $1.75 million in investment financing. In 2009, they had 19  systems in operation; in 2010, they more than tripled that number.
 Technically, most of the problems were solved by 2008. But to make  the business viable has required an ongoing process of what has been  called “frugal innovation”  — radically simplifying things to serve the needs of poor customers who  would otherwise be excluded from basic market services due to their  limited ability to pay.
  In order to bring down costs, for example, the company stripped down  the gasifiers and engines, removing everything non-essential that added  to manufacturing or maintenance expenses, like turbocharging. They  replaced an automated water-aided process for the removal of rice husk  char (burned husks) from gasifiers with one that uses 80 percent less  water and can be operated with a hand crank. They kept labor costs down  by recruiting locals, often from very poor families with modest  education levels (who would be considered unemployable by many  companies) and training them to operate and load machines, and work as  fee collectors and auditors, going door-to-door ensuring that villagers  aren’t using more electricity than they pay for. (Electricity theft is a  national problem in India, resulting in losses to power companies  estimated at 30 percent. Husk Power says it has managed to keep such  losses down to five percent.)
 When the company noticed that customers were purchasing poor-quality  CFL bulbs, which waste energy, they partnered with Havells India, a  large manufacturer, to purchase thousands of high quality bulbs at  discount rates, which their collectors now sell to clients. They also  saw that collectors could become discount suppliers of other products —  like soap, biscuits and oil — so they added a product fulfillment  business into the mix.
 And they found ways to extract value from the rice husk char — the  waste product of a waste product — by setting up another side business  turning the char into incense sticks. This business now operates in five  locations and provides supplemental income to 500 women. The company  also receives government subsidies for renewable energy and is seeking  Clean Development Mechanism benefits.
 With growth, human audits have proven inadequate to control  electricity theft or inadvertent overuse. So the company developed a  stripped-down pre-payment smart-card reader for home installation. The  going rate for smart-card readers is between $50 and $90. Husk Power is  near completion of one that Pandey says will cost under $7.
 Alone, none of these steps would have been significant. Taken  together, however, they make it possible for power units to deliver tiny  volumes of electricity while enjoying a 30 percent profit margin. The  side businesses add another 20 percent to the bottom line. Pandey says  new power units become profitable within 2 to 3 months of installation.  He expects the company to be financially self-sustaining by June 2011.
 From a social standpoint, there are many benefits to this business  model. In addition to the fact that electricity allows shop keepers to  stay open later and farmers to irrigate more land, and lighting  increases children’s studying time and reduces burglaries and  snakebites, the company also channels most of its wages and payments for  services directly back into the villages it serves.
 For decades, countries have operated on the assumption that power  from large electricity plants will eventually trickle down to villagers.  In many parts of the world, this has proven to be elusive. Husk Power  has identified at least 25,000 villages across Bihar and neighboring  states in India’s rice belt as appropriate for its model. Ramapati  Kumar, an advisor on Climate and Energy for Greenpeace India, who has  studied Husk Power, explained that the company’s model could “go a long  way in bringing light to 125,000 unelectrified villages in India,” while  reducing “the country’s dependence on fossil fuels.”
 It’s too soon to say whether Husk Power will prove to be successful  in the long run. As with any young company, there are many unknowns. To  achieve its goals, it will need to recruit and train thousands of  employees over the next four years, raise additional financing, and  institute sound management practices. Many companies destroy themselves  in the process of trying to expand aggressively.
 But the lessons here go beyond the fortunes of Husk Power. What the  company illustrates is a different way to think about innovation — one  that is suitable for  global problems that stem from poor people’s lack  of access to energy, water, housing and education. In many cases,  success in these challenges hinges less on big new ideas than on  collections of small old ideas well integrated and executed. “What’s  replicable isn’t the distribution of electricity,” says Pandey. “It’s  the whole process of how to take an old technology and apply it to local  constraints. How to create a system out of the materials and labor that  are readily available.”
 Let me know if you’ve come across other examples of innovations that follow this pattern.
 Join Fixes on Facebook »
 David Bornstein is the author of “How to Change the World,” which has been published in 20 languages, and “The Price of a Dream: The Story of the Grameen Bank,” and is co-author of “Social Entrepreneurship: What Everyone Needs to Know.” He is the founder of dowser.org, a media site that reports on social innovation.
Dear Friends,
I am reposting a fascinating article from The New York Times: The Opinion Pages about a unique approach to light in the darkness!
~Apoorva